Sunday 27 March 2022

Why Aurobindo was such a vacuous bore

 Aurobindo, like the other great Revolutionaries of his generation, was a sensible enough man. He knew  Gandhi was a nutter and Hindu Muslim unity a pipe dream. Sadly, Aurobindo didn't understand either Hinduism or Yoga or how to write a single sentence which wasn't vacuous, boring, and as stupid as fuck.

This is Sri Aurobindo on the Gita. What school boy error is he making?

... the primal principle that underlies all the power of this manifestation in the universe.. is this that in every being and object God dwells concealed and discoverable;

The answer, obviously, is that concealment does not entail discoverability. In any case, a God who really wants to conceal himself can't be discoverable unless he isn't God at all.  

he is housed as in a crypt in the mind and heart of every thing and creature, an inner self in the core of its subjective and its objective becoming, one who is the beginning and middle and end of all that is, has been or will be.

 So God is basically a corpse buried in the heart and mind and soul and once you die and your body rots, all that is left after your dust has blown away is this invisible cadaver. 

Aurobindo's English was good. He had studied in England from the age of 7. He won a scholarship to St. Paul's. He excelled in Greek and Latin. True, he wrote carelessly and was cut off from cultivated society. Still, when the guy says 'crypt' he knows very well that the word means a place where a corpse is interred. Aurobindo isn't making some sort of Nietzschean point about God being dead. He is saying Life sucks. Die to the part of yourself that is vivacious. Be so vacuous a bore that God himself breaks out of the crypt that is your tedious soul and gets the fuck away from your stinking entrails. 

For it is this inner divine Self hidden from the mind and heart which he inhabits, this luminous Inhabitant concealed from the view of the soul in Nature which he has put forth into Nature as his representative, who is all the time evolving the mutations of our personality in Time and our sensational existence in Space, — Time and Space that are the conceptual movement and extension of the Godhead in us.

But that Godhead is interred in us. While we live, it is just a fucking skeleton in the cupboard. Aurobindo didn't get that Evolution is about adaptation to a shifting, uncertain, fitness landscape. There is some suspense, some drama, to the thing. But, for the Bengali sage, it was some very boring and vacuous process of being so fucking boring and vacuous that God god himself runs away. Immanence is all very well but even God is not immune to ennui.  

All is this selfseeing Soul, this self-representing Spirit. For ever from within all beings, from within all conscient and inconscient existences, this All-conscient develops his manifested self in quality and power, develops it in the forms of objects, in the instruments of our subjectivity, in knowledge and word and thinking, in the creations of the mind and in the passion and actions of the doer, in the measures of Time, in cosmic powers and godheads and in the forces of Nature, in plant life, in animal life, in human and superhuman beings. If we look at things with this eye of vision unblinded by differentiations of quality and quantity or by difference of values and oppositions of nature, we shall see that all things are in fact and can be nothing but powers of his manifestation, vibhutis of this universal Soul and Spirit, Yoga of this great Yogin, self-creations of this marvellous self-Creator.

That's not the Gita's message. God is the sole efficient cause. The 'eye of vision' is always his gratuitous gift. It is not something attainable by any Yoga though, no doubt, the Lord may favor a devotee with it. One implication of this thesis is that being a vacuous bore can cancel immanence. God can choose to run the fuck away from your monotonous imbecility. On the other hand if you are doing cool stuff- like Arjuna who is very good at shooting arrows at other blokes who are also very good at shooting arrows- then, maybe, God himself will turn up and the two of you can have super cool adventures. At any rate, that's the message of the Gita.  

He is the unborn and the all-pervading Master of his own innumerable becomings in the universe, ajo vibhuh. ; all things are his powers and effectuations in his self-Nature, vibhutis. He is the origin of all they are, their beginning; he is their support in their everchanging status, their middle; he is their end too, the culmination or the disintegration of each created thing in its cessation or its disappearance.

But God can run away from a boring blathershite. There is no limitation on his powers. This is a bit like the imkan-e-kibz controversy in Indian Islam. 

People 'looking for God' tend to be more boring than average. They need to understand that the Deus Absconditus runs the fuck away from earnest but deeply boring peeps. I don't deny that God is no connoisseur of my farts- and I am highly flatulent person- but then I experience ever increasing wonderment and delight at their repetition and that makes up for much which others may find sad and dispiriting about my way of life. 

He brings them out from his consciousness and is hidden in them, he withdraws them into his consciousness and they are hidden in him for a time or for ever.

Come to think of it, when I was a kid I could never find any of the very many people who would challenge me to 'hide and seek'. Like God, instead of hiding, they just ran the fuck away. I suppose Aurobindo suffered in the same manner- not because he was flatulent but because he was a vacuous verbose bore.  

What is apparent to us is only a power of becoming of the One:

Or a power of running the fuck away rather than hiding somewhere where the bore might find us.  

what disappears from our sense and vision is effect of that power of becoming of the One.

That is the opposite of the Gita's teaching- viz. Occassionalism. All effects visible or otherwise discoverable are effects of the Lord, the sole efficient cause. This does not mean our being a flatulent bore is the effect of a power of becoming.  It is a modality, self chosen and not determinate in any way, of immanent being which encompasses its own running the fuck away from vacuous, flatulent, bores. 

All classes, genera, species, individuals are such vibhutis.

Unless God doesn't want them to be any such thing.  

But since it is through power in his becoming that he is apparent to us,

Nope. The Gita affirms that 'his being apparent to us' is entirely a matter of his own will.  

he is especially apparent in whatever is of a pre-eminent value or seems to act with a powerful and pre-eminent force.

Aurobindo was, pre-eminently, a force of great vacuity. If bores were valuable, he would be prized above all others. But bores aint valuable and that isn't God's fault- unless he wants it to be.

And therefore in each kind of being we can see him most in those in whom the power of nature of that kind reaches its highest, its leading, its most effectively selfrevealing manifestation.

Only if God so wills. But why the fuck would God want anything about him to become communicable in the tedious lucubrations of a vacuous bore?  

These are in a special sense Vibhutis. Yet the highest power and manifestation is only a very partial revelation of the Infinite; even the whole universe is informed by only one degree of his greatness, illumined by one ray of his splendour, glorious with a faint hint of his delight and beauty. This is in sum the gist of the enumeration, the result we carry away from it, the heart of its meaning.

That may be the meaning a vacuous bore carries away from the Gita. But that isn't its message. God is the only efficient cause. Sadly we don't have any idea as to what 'efficient cause' means. Why would we need to? It is enough for us to follow, like Leibniz, a principle of continuity. What can be usefully said of the finite can also be usefully said of the infinite. We find Aurobindo as boring as fuck and run the fuck away from his shite. An immanent, infinite, Godhead would do the same.  

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Was Ramana Maharishi the real deal?
Also please if you will shed light on the tradition of spiritual entrepreneurship adapted by Sadhguru from Oshno

windwheel said...

I spent some thinking before replying. But my reply is without any thought. It is just spontaneous.

Ramana was a sincere and simple man without any pretensions. Some say that it was foreigners- Paul Brunton, Somerset Maugham- who turned him into a celebrity but the truth is they were both experienced and well-travelled men who could spot the genuine article when they saw it. But, back then there were many such. My grandfather had a brilliant batch-mate. They both sat Railway Service exam together. Then the brilliant boy received news, his entire family was wiped out in Spanish flu epidemic. He became a wanderer- Railway Baba he was known as among the Hindustanis- and somehow he found my father when he had run away from an Anglo-Indian boarding school where Indians were insulted. This was during the Second World War.
Later, at the time of father's marriage this same man appeared suddenly outside the house of my maternal grandmother. Dad went to take his blessing but he refused and spoke to him in the German language. Father decided on the spot to accept the marriage and then was posted to Germany where my sister and I were born. I used to have doubt on such stories. But I am old now and have seen many more such things. Are these people 'jivanmukta'? Do they get divine power? Or do we humans give this power to such personalities in the same way that we put money in the Bank?

Osho was a Jain Philosophy lecturer with a good business model. Jain Sadhus and Sadhvis rate him so maybe there is something to him. But Jains don't believe that grace can be transferred between people whereas we feel that whether Grace is coming from the Lord or we ordinary mortals store up such grace in people like Railway Baba so that it may be released when required, still, in either case, transfer of Grace is the basis of the economy of the Universe. This transfer may even be for money, sex, land, political power or even ideology because even the worst things are never entirely bad.

I have known one or two sane and rational people who have fallen prey to crazy cults. But I've also seen completely crazy Westerners who went to India or Japan or whatever and came back sane and normal. One fellow- a complete punk/skinhead type thug- who was the younger brother of a close friend (the first in his family to go to College) went to Goa for drugs and sex but his flight was diverted. Somehow he ended up in ISKCON. He came back two years later with Indian wife as a pure Vegetarian with good body and appearance. His Sanskrit pronunciation puts us to shame. But he is normal fellow and is doing well financially and socially. Sometimes he visits me and has a bit of 'daru'. Wife is 100 percent English now! She had put on weight after 2 kids but then got into Yoga and all that stuff and has her own Yoga business! Good luck to them. They are living well and paying taxes and kids are also doing well. But is this 'Spirituality'? Was Swami Prabhupada 'spiritual' like Ramana? My answer is yes. They are two sides of same coin though one may be classed as Vaishnav and other as 'Smarta'.



windwheel said...

Sadhguru is handsome and entrepreneurial similar to some American Televangelists. Nothing wrong in that. Religion is a Service industry.Because India has risen up economically and in self-defence capacity, naturally, we are not having 'sex, drugs' Gurus. Like any other stable and strong Society we have preceptors who want to foster middle class and decent values.I recall many years ago, one 'poor' relative was supposed to take me to see Mata Amritanandamayi but then some rich people turned up and took me somewhere else. I have written about this in my novel 'Samlee's daughter'. Now I am reading that Mataji's 'Amrita University' is climbing the ranks for private colleges. Apparently this Saint's parents were from Kerala fishing community. I became aware that these fearless and pious people called 'Varunakula' have very advanced spiritual and scriptural knowledge. Immeasurably they contributed to Tamil and Sri Lankan and Thai and Indonesian culture, religion, morality and spirituality. Sadly, India is neglecting Varuna's realm.



One poem I'm proud of- 'So much heavier wet/ we must leave it be/Heart the net/ & she the Sea.'

What is your own opinion?

Anonymous said...

Personally I feel Ramana was the real deal, as my pati absconded to his ashram in her rebellious girlhood—only for him to enjoin her to return to her upper class Mylapore family. I have also visited the site of his samadhi at Thiruvannamalai and enjoyed the serene atmosphere, notwithstanding the somewhat tacky plaster decor. Yet I have also visited Auroville and marveled at the big golden egg. I admire the visionary qualities of Aurobindoism at a distance, but when you zoom in it seems to decohere. As if he were fashioning himself into a cosmic guru in the reflective gaze of Westerners overseas. I recently confirmed this sense by having a go at his awful Miltonic epic Savitri; it could not hold my attention for even a chapter. It is sad that Edwin Arnold’s Light of Asia is still maybe the best long English poem on an Indian religious theme. As for your own verse, I confess that the diction is often rather recherche for my own liking, but I do like this one about the sea

windwheel said...

Apparently Aurobindo's own wife- Mrinalini whom he married by Hindu rites though his family was Brahmo- had a difficult and rather sad life. He wanted her to regard him as her God but, in Savitri, decided that the rendezvous between God and the Soul can only be in an entirely lonely Universe. Aurobindo uses the term uchchvaas to mean 'bombast' though the word also has the yogic meaning of the expelled breath. What was lacking in his Savitri was inspiration. Marriage under Hindu rites doesn't really turn hubby into a God. It ought to have the reverse effect- more particularly if a little baby suddenly turns up.
Still, Aurobindo and his younger brother Barin showed great courage in the national cause. Then, it turned, out they were slitting their own throats. With the departure of the British the bhadralok would decline.