Friday, 20 March 2026

Is Iran weakening Trump?

The Economist claims that 

War in Iran is making Donald Trump weaker—and angrier

Trump turns into a lame-duck the moment people feel sure he will lose the mid-terms. Two Supreme Court judges have already turned against Trump. A Dem controlled Congress could push for Biden type reforms of SCOTUS which, by itself, would cause the Bench to draw in its horns. Obviously, the Dems will launch investigations & impeachment hearings against Trump & his pals. Maybe everybody will have to resign to get a pardon from Vance. But who will pardon Vance? If he resigns, a Dem would become President. 

By diminishing the president’s political superpowers, his reckless campaign may make him more dangerous

Presidents only have super-powers if neither SCOTUS nor Congress will check them. Still, Markets can turn against them, in which case his party loses the mid-terms. Thus everything comes down to the mid-terms which in turn comes down to the Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index. 


NEVER BET against Donald Trump.

Unless you want to make money as happened in 2020. Don't bet on a diversity hire like Kamala.  

No politician can defy political gravity like the man whose supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6th 2021, only for him to be re-elected in 2024 with a bigger share of the vote. And yet it is hard to imagine a crisis more precisely engineered to intercept the trajectory of his presidency than his ill-judged, heedless war against Iran.

He would lose anyway based on cost-push pressure from tariffs. The other thing is, Israel sees Iran as an existential threat. If they go in alone things could escalate to the nuclear level. Iran, under its 'Mosaic' doctrine of autonomy for local commanders, would shut down the Straits of Hormuz in any case. If the big dog is part of the operation, financial markets remain calm. What is happening is mere 'mowing the lawn' so long as it is US led. Don't forget Israelis are from the Middle East. Them guys be kray kray.  

Even a short war will alter the course of his second term.

His second term turns to shit if the Dems take both Houses. 

One that lasts months could bring it crashing to earth.

Not necessarily. Lots of Americans don't like rag-heads. Taken together with ICE biting the faces off migrant children, the Republicans may get the iggnirint racist vote (which, I fondly believe, represents the vast majority of decent, gun-toting, inbred, American folk) 

The reason is that the fight against Iran diminishes Mr Trump’s three political superpowers: his ability to impose his own reality on the world,

Kamala truly was shit. Biden truly was senile. That was the reality which enabled Trump to return to the White House. 

his remorseless use of leverage and his dominion over the Republican Party.

both of which are predicated on the same thing- viz. his ability to win elections. We think 'it is the economy, stupid.' We may be wrong. Americans may be xenophobic sociopaths who jizz in their pants when Muslims are killed or darker skin kids are deported.  

Even without Iran, the potency of these Trumpian strengths was likely to wane after the midterm elections. Wars accelerate change.

No. You don't swap horses mid-stream. But Iran isn't really a war. It is 'mowing the lawn'. The US is ten years ahead of China in terms of force projection. The Americans are sending an unmistakeable signal. Trump thinks this gives him a better bargaining position relative to Xi. After all, China loses most from nuclear proliferation. There is a domino effect if Iran goes nuclear or is accepted as being at that level. Japan & Taiwan & maybe the Philippines follow suit. Also, Iran's asymmetric naval tactics could be imitated by other littoral states or insurgent groups threatening other 'choke point' straits. Maybe the new G2 can make a deal based on US having force projection capability of a type China may only gain in a decade's time.  A foreign policy win of that type gives Trump a 'super-power' nobody has ever attributed to him- viz. being an honest to God statesman of the highest calibre.  

Start with Trump v Reality. In politics, the president has shown a remarkable ability to twist facts

rather than whine about how 'facts' are totes misogynist and racist and don't understand that diversity hires need to be told they are beautiful and smart and actually surprisingly tall given they are short & dumpy.  

and, sure enough, he insists that he has already triumphed in Iran. Yet the war tells a truth of its own. Iran’s regime cannot win in any conventional sense.

Nor can lose in the conventional sense. Nobody wants to put boots on its ground. Also, nobody would think any agreement they accede to is worth the paper it is printed on.  

But despite widespread destruction of infrastructure and the assassinations of senior leaders—including the security chief, Ali Larijani—Iran’s regime survives for now and its 400kg or so of near-bomb-ready uranium remains at large.

Why aren't wars over in 15 minutes? The answer is the only such wars are nuclear wars. That's what the US wants to avoid.  

What is more, Iran is waging its own parallel war against the global energy industry.

It is bombing its neighbours- even former friend Qatar.  

As it strikes shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and the infrastructure of its neighbours, the markets are keeping score. With Brent crude spiking to more than $110 a barrel on March 18th,

In 2008 oil reached the equivalent of 200 dollars. That's what Iran is aiming for.  

following an Iranian missile attack on a Qatari natural-gas hub, the regime will conclude that its strategy is working.

Israel is laughing its head off as Qatar mulls expelling Hamas. To be fair, Hamas has appealed to Iran to stop targeting Qatar.  

If anything, time is on Iran’s side.

Time is on the side of the rich. If Israel & US- maybe also Saudi Arabia- start targeting Iran's export capacity & even domestic gas consumption- then what is on Iran's side is abject poverty & more intensive brain drain & capital flight. 

America and Israel will gradually run out of useful targets to strike from the air, or run low on interceptor batteries to see off Iranian weapons.

What matters is whether local commanders find they can't restock inventories because of supply chain disruption. When that happens they become more thrifty in their use of missiles & drones. This means de facto de-escalation.  

By contrast, Iran appears still to have plenty of drones. For as long as it restricts traffic in the strait, oil prices will climb and the damage to the world economy will grow.

Damage to oil importers will grow. Oil exporters outside the Gulf are laughing all the way to the bank. What matters is how China reacts. It may do a deal with the US whereby there is a partnership to protect the freedom of the Seas & ensure neither crazy despots nor insurgents can close down vital maritime se lanes. After all, China is the 'workshop of the world'. It is the world's biggest ship builder. It wants stable commodity prices. It doesn't want to be in bed with crazy jihadis.  

Mr Trump’s second superpower is leverage.

Carrying a big stick is leverage provided you speak quietly. If you scream your tits off you don't have leverage. You are merely a mugger. 

Now that other countries’ leaders have come to expect rough treatment, they are learning how to resist.

Not Iran. It is getting the shit kicked out of it. Why have there been no 9/11 type attacks? Fuck is the point of funding terror if your terrorists are terrified of the TSA? 

When the president called on America’s allies to help open the strait,

if the US can't do it, nobody can.  

warning that NATO faced a “very bad” future

true enough 

if they refused, they turned him down.

What choice did they have?  

He quickly reversed course, pretending he had never needed help.

Because if the US can't do it, no one can. 

Likewise, Iran is opposing Mr Trump by accumulating leverage against him.

Israel is their enemy. They need to cool it with the 'Death to America' schtick.  

In recent days it has signalled that it will grant safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz to ships from friendly countries—a sign that it means to use access as a bargaining tool.

It will need to charge.  

Even if Mr Trump wants to end the war, Iran could continue to fire at ships. If the waterway remains closed until the end of April, the oil price could reach $150 a barrel.

& Iran's oil & gas fields may go up in flames.  

Given that leverage, Iran may hold out for more than just a return to the status quo before the war. It may ask for sanctions to be lifted, or an American commitment to abandon some bases in the Middle East or to restrain Israel.

Coz demanding America nuke itself might be considered over-reach. 

If recession looms in America and stockmarkets start to fall, would Mr Trump escalate by, say, seizing Kharg island, home to Iran’s export terminals? Or would he buckle?

Either way he loses the mid-terms. He might as well go for broke. America is a net oil exporter. Let the rag-heads bomb each other to buggery & laugh all the way to the bank.  


The answer depends partly on the last of his powers: his hold on his party.

He has made the party his bitch too often for him to start doubting himself now.  

Mr Trump was elected on promises to spare voters from war and inflation.

No. He was elected because the alternative was cackling Kamala. No politician promises voters he will start wars & raise inflation  

So far, 13 American service personnel have died; ground operations inside Iran, to recover that uranium, or on Kharg would put many more in danger.

So, don't do it. Just drop bombs.  

Average prices of petrol and diesel have reached $3.88 and $5.09 a gallon, compared with $3.11 and $3.72 at Mr Trump’s inauguration. Republican support for the war is strong, but softening. A vocal faction of MAGA, notably Tucker Carlson (interviewed on “The Insider”, our video show, this week), talks of betrayal.

Because they are paranoid. Also, did you know Jews crucified Baby Jesus? Guess who is running Israel? Jews! It's a fucking conspiracy is what it is.  

In private many elected Republicans are seething.

Being Trump's bitch can have that effect. 

Mr Trump’s failure to heed warnings about the Strait of Hormuz

the warning would be 'if we don't go in, Israel will do some evil shit all on its lonesome. Anybody can mine the Straits.  

is typical of his contempt for strategy and his hubris in thinking he knows better than people who really do.

Nobody knows shit. Will the Gulf be radioactive five years from now. Possibly.  

Republicans are now highly likely to lose control of the House in the midterm elections in November. Their chances of losing the Senate too have risen by ten points, to about 50%.

More to the point, there will be an increasing number of Republican Senators whose vote can't be relied on. If even Gorsuch & Amy Coney Barrett have defected, how likely is it that Rand Paul or Susan Collins (assuming she beats her Democratic rival) won't flip?  

The worse the defeat, the lamer a duck the president will be and the less influence he will have over who inherits the party.

Either he wins big or he goes home- in a fucking casket. The only way he doesn't lose the mid-terms is if there is a silent majority of xenophobic sociopaths who hate immigrants & Muslims wherever they might live.  

Were the war to drag on, leading to very high oil prices and tumbling stockmarkets, Mr Trump could seek a way out and look for a win somewhere else—in, say, Cuba.

Russia is sending oil & gas tankers to Cuba. Maybe that's not the place Trump can get a win.  

Markets would doubtless register relief if the fighting stopped. But Mr Trump is not in full control of this war.

Because he isn't in full control of Israel.  

Iran’s attack on the gas hub in Qatar shows it still has cards to play.

At the moment, it seems Trump has restrained Israel- but for how long.  

And even if the fighting ended tomorrow it could take four to six weeks to restore oil production, four to eight weeks to settle oil markets and two months to normalise shipping. The risk of renewed Iranian action would remain. Prices may stay high for months. Every day they do weakens the president.

Currently, futures markets think oil will remain near the 100 dollar mark. But they expect 60 next year.  

Mr Trump’s politics depends on the strength that comes from winning.

No. It depends on his rival being shit. But you can't rely on the Dems fucking up.  

If he seems a loser, expect him to exact retribution.

Losers can't exact shit. If Trump can't strong arm the Spanish, fuck can he do.  

A weaker president could become a more dangerous one.

No. A weaker president faces stronger checks & balances.  

Tanking

Mr Trump is freest to act abroad. He may abandon NATO.

Not unless he can magically rehouse 100,000 American military personnel currently based in Europe. 

He may cut Ukraine loose to punish Europe.

Europe has prepared for this. More to the point, so has Ukraine.  

He could bully Latin America in the name of fighting crime and drugs.

Europe has done a deal with Mercosur.  

He may demand money for defending Japan and South Korea.

It is easy to agree to pay. Getting the money is the hard part.  

He will be maximalist on tariffs.

which pushes up inflation 

Even if he does not succeed, that will further erode America’s alliances, to the glee of China and Russia.

Weak Presidents get bypassed. There is such a thing as a 'Deep State'.  

But Mr Trump is also liable to lash out at home.

That's when you get the real pushback. The fucker ends up impeached & in jail.  

He has already endorsed the idea of withholding broadcasting licences from media outlets that criticise the war.

A double edged sword if ever there was one.  

He wants the Federal Reserve to slash rates, but his war makes that less likely—expect further clashes with the central bank.

There may be an international consensus to do so more particularly if there is a flight to the dollar.  

He could target perceived enemies or send immigration agents to more Democratic-run cities.

That hasn't worked out well for him. I may be wrong.  

He could threaten to meddle in the midterms, either as theatre to rile his opponents, or because he intends to influence the results. It is hard to see how Mr Trump ends up a winner in Iran.

Unless he ups the ante & takes out Iran's export capacity. Why not bottle up the Persian Gulf & let all the rag-heads go down together?  

Be warned: he makes a very bad loser.

No. He makes a bad winner but a merely sore & self-pitying loser. The Statesman-like thing, which secures his legacy, is to take Iran permanently off the chessboard. Seal off the Straits & let the Gulf go back to herding camels or whatever. China may agree that Political Islam has had its day. If Trump can do a deal with Xi, then he has a legacy- albeit of a Nixonian type. Still, this may keep him from a Federal prison even if the proposals Biden made for Judicial Reform are enacted by a Democratic Congress.  

No comments: