There is a view that if a man has sex with a woman, he enjoys it while she hates it and thus all such sexual activity is nothing but rape. You may ask why some women initiate sex with attractive men and appear to experience orgasm. The answer is that they have been brainwashed by the patriarchy. Also, if they hadn't had that sex you can be sure they would have been beaten, sodomized, stretched on the Rack by the Spanish Inquisition, hanged, drawn and quartered by the King's High Executioner and subjected to fat shaming. This is the Feminist ideology.
A similar ideology can be espoused by 'anti-Racists'. If White peeps exist, obviously they are discriminating against Blacks and exploiting the fuck out of them and anally raping them etc. If this weren't the case, why would White peeps exist? They would all have topped themselves or undergone gene therapy so as not to be White just as no heterosexual man is not a deliberate, calculating, rapist because otherwise he would have cut his own dick off or had gender reassignment surgery.
What of Socialism? According to the Fundamental Theorem of Marxism attributed to Morishima-Seton-Okishia, it a mathematically provable fact that, in a market economy, if profits of firms are positive then it must also be the case that workers are being exploited. Suppose profits rise as workers are laid off. This means the remaining workers are being exploited even more intensively. Suppose you use your land to open an enterprise but it runs at a loss. You finally sack all your workers. Then you sell the land at a big profit thus putting yourself ahead of the game. Clearly, your now non existent workforce is being very horribly exploited.
The question arises- does it also follow that if profits are negative, capitalists are exploited? No. After all, capitalists freely choose to invest. Unlike the worker, who is beaten, sodomized, tortured on the Rack by the Spanish Inquisition, hanged drawn & quartered and subjected to unfair comment regarding his dick size by the running dogs of the Boss class, the capitalist is free to desist from any type of productive activity. Thus, he can't be exploited by the worker unless of course he is actually a widow or an orphan dependent on dividend income. However, as is well known, widows and orphans are very quickly sent down coal mines after being swindled out of their inheritance by evil Solicitors wearing silk Top-hats and monocles.
I suppose one could say 'profit is a reward for bearing risk. If the reward is zero, there is no entrepreneurship, no insurance companies, no arbitrage- i.e. no market makers- and thus no markets.' Morishima might reply, 'there is a rational distribution of Income based on shadow prices or Shapley values of something of that sort. Then you would still have Management- i.e. people paid salaries to combine the factors of production and to work as actuaries and accountants and so forth- in which case there would be no exploitation.' The problem here is that Management is notorious for beating, sodomizing, torturing on the Rack, and hanging drawing and quartering Workers in between exploiting them and making fun of their puny genitals.
What if everything is Nationalized? The problem there is that bureaucrats are notorious for beating, sodomizing, torturing on the Rack and hanging, drawing, and quartering workers in between exploiting them and making fun of their puny genitals.
My own proposal which I made to Professor Morishima in 1979 was that the means of production should be exclusively owned by kittens. This is because kittens tend to get easily distracted and thus abstain from beating or sodomizing the proletariat so as to destroy their class consciousness. The problem here is that if the workers are not exploited- because kittens are too busy playing with balls of yarn- the rate of profit will turn negative. This means, sooner or later, there are no fucking workers. There are just dudes who are self-employed or else they are begging borrowing or stealing to stay alive. However, suppose some of these people have White dicks. Then it follows that all women will be be being incessantly raped while all Blacks would be being enslaved and exploited in various ways. But, if there is exploitation, then there must be 'profit'- right? But that means there are Capitalists! Thus, we have shown that the existence of White Dicks, by itself, is enough to cause Rape (even if it is called 'Marriage') Capitalism (even if it is called 'Management' and occurs in the Public or Voluntary sector) and Slavery (even if it is cunningly referred to as 'affirmative action').
Obviously, there are places where White dicks are few and far between. In such cases we could refer to the dicks of those of a particular religion or class and the same argument can go through. It should be remembered that the word 'proletarian' means 'child-bearing'- i.e. that segment of the population which serves the state by reproducing itself and thus maintaining the population level. Clearly, dicks have a role in creating and sustaining the proletariat. However, as we have seen, it is for the fell purpose of raping and exploiting and slut or body shaming everything- including the Environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment