Pascal's Muggle, Negative Probababilities & the Book of Job

Suppose a beggar asks you for 5 quid in return for saving the lives of billions in a Universe he controls. You demur. He then shows you that he is a Matrix Lord and does in fact control such a Universe and only asked your for a fiver because he is running an experiment in behavioral Econ re evidential decision theory.

This is the 'not even wrong' scenario described by Elizier Yudkowsky over at Lesswrong.
My response is-

You may be aware of the use of negative probabilities in machine learning and quantum mechanics and, of course, Economics. For the last, the appearance of a 'Matrix Lord' has such a large negative probability that it   indicates the existence of highly possible as yet unspecified possible states of the world such that the decision situation is swamped and no money changes hands on the basis of the agent's decision theory.

Thus Pascal's muggle isn't interesting- it's a wank for nerds who get off on words like 'gogoolplex' and  random invocations of Kosmogorov complexity theory.

On the other hand, the reverse situation- Job's complaint against God- is profound. It shows why variables with negative probabilities tend to disappear out of discourse to be replaced by the difference between two independent 'normal' variables- in the Biblical case, univocal Cosmic Justice is replaced by the I-Thou relationship of 'God' & 'Man'.

What do I mean by Negative Probabilities?
Think of them as constraints on observation/decision spaces
Suppose I have a Utility function for possible states of the world. Is it reasonable to believe this Utility function is independent of the mechanism by which those states of the world come into being? No. Otherwise 'the monkey's paw' wouldn't be a good story. Indeed, for any state of the world brought about in a way we thought incompossible with our Universe, something so drastic has happened to our Information Set that we must abandon the decision problem altogether and forget about our Utility function because we need to start thinking about the nature of this unexpected Universe we find ourselves in and what sort of things we ought to want in it (meta-preferences).  One way to do this is to assign negative probabilities to states of the world arrived at by what we currently consider incompossible means. This immediately means that there is at least one new possible state of the world which hasn't yet been assigned a probability. So decision making halts till that new state or states have been specified or speculated about.

In the Pascal Muggle example, clearly the fact that a Matrix Lord exists completely changes what we want out of Life.
Job's agon, on the other hand, changes what we want out of death.
All Philosophy is practicing that death.