Herrick's Umasvati creed

In this short birth

on this ever more imperfect Earth

Why be clever?

Or seek

as did Grothendieck

a Yoga of Forever?

Given that, but Whiskey, or Gin, lies in wait

For those averse to the Viyogini's fate

At David Deutsch's old Grammar School

Because I was and am an utter fool

My conatus required I conceive all possible cosmic constructors

As but the familial friction of my- forsaken!- karmic obstructors

Whenas in Kanchi Silks, my bridal Kashi goes

Then, then, methinks, 'bros before hoes'! 

Not mine, with Herrick's tidal creed can alter

For of Sand the Book of its every Psalter.

N.B

For Deutsch a constructor is 'anything that can cause transformations in physical systems without undergoing any net change in its ability to do so.'  Obviously, if ability is infinite, net change is always zero even if an infinite amount is taken away or added to it. However, Umaswati- perhaps working in a discrete math, combinatorial, framework- distinguished between denumerable and non-denumerable infinity, so as to arrive at an optimistic Soteriological result which renders Jainism 'observationally equivalent' to Advaita and Madhyamaka. What was Umaswati's framework? In Literature, there is the Jain novel where the same cast of characters are reborn to 'obstruct' each other's karmic progression to gnosis. But that's also what happened in the Swedenborgian 'Good Place' on Netflix!