tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1674709389503889160.post1005813044717126394..comments2024-03-25T14:25:25.102+00:00Comments on Poetry as Socio-proctology: Simpson's paradox and Social Impact Bonds.windwheelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18099651877551933295noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1674709389503889160.post-68856333394655138332015-09-14T21:59:45.848+01:002015-09-14T21:59:45.848+01:00Not to my knowledge. I can't think of any reas...Not to my knowledge. I can't think of any reason why SIBs shouldn't be decomposable. Also, contingent assets are generally good for preference revelation. Indeed, such mechanism design ought to make decisions more situational/Muth rational rather than trait based/mimetic. I'd imagine there's some thresholds re diversity and population size which are relevant.windwheelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18099651877551933295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1674709389503889160.post-22621904980638983722015-09-14T18:06:29.139+01:002015-09-14T18:06:29.139+01:00Is there a theory of tradable SIBs? I saw this htt...Is there a theory of tradable SIBs? I saw this http://s3.amazonaws.com/mildredwarner.org/attachments/000/000/413/original/d116aef904347207d0dd8d5916616045<br />I suppose fully tradable SIBs would also be decomposable such that the person able to have highest impact can bid a given sliver. This could be the other side of a Preference Revelation mechanism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com